Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/10382
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrundell, S.-
dc.contributor.authorTsopelas, C.-
dc.contributor.authorChatterton, B.-
dc.contributor.authorTouloumtzoglou, J.-
dc.contributor.authorBlefari, C.-
dc.contributor.authorHewett, P.-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationDiseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2003; 46(5):637-642-
dc.identifier.issn0012-3706-
dc.identifier.issn1530-0358-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/10382-
dc.description.abstract<h4>Introduction</h4>We have reported previously on an in vitro model to examine tumor cell adherence to metal and plastic laparoscopic ports and to port sites through which they had been passed. This demonstrated that increased numbers of tumor cells were found both on metal ports compared with plastic ports and on the port sites through which metal ports had passed. In this study, the in vivo adherence of such cells to ports and port sites was investigated.<h4>Methods</h4>LIM 1215 tumor cells were injected under direct vision into the pelvises of 16 30-kg female pigs (range, 15-70 x 106 cells). A total of 12 ports were inserted through each anterior abdominal wall (6 metal and 6 plastic), and these were either left in situ for 30 minutes (nondisplaced) or were removed twice and replaced through the original wound (displaced).<h4>Results</h4>Increasing the tumor cell inoculum resulted in increased deposition of tumor cells on both ports (P = 0.002) and on the port sites (P = 0.017). Significantly more tumor cells adhered to metal ports than to plastic ports (P = 0.04), although this failed to reach significance for the sites through which metal ports had been passed (P = 0.066). Although displacement of ports did not increase the number of tumor cells that adhered to ports (P = 0.45), this did result in more tumor cells being deposited on the port sites (P = 0.01).<h4>Conclusions</h4>These data suggest that minimizing the number of tumor cells within the abdominal cavity, using plastic ports, and securing ports to prevent inadvertent displacement would be expected to reduce the number of tumor cells deposited in port sites during operative laparoscopy. This may be beneficial in reducing the incidence of port-site metastases after laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilitySimeon Brundell, Chris Tsopelas, Barry Chatterton, Joanna Touloumtzoglou, Cristina Blefari, Peter J. Hewett-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6624-z-
dc.subjectTumor Cells, Cultured-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectSwine-
dc.subjectCarcinoma-
dc.subjectColonic Neoplasms-
dc.subjectNeoplasm Seeding-
dc.subjectForeign-Body Migration-
dc.subjectMetals-
dc.subjectPlastics-
dc.subjectLaparoscopy-
dc.subjectModels, Animal-
dc.subjectSurgical Instruments-
dc.subjectEquipment Contamination-
dc.subjectCell Adhesion-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.titleEffect of port composition on tumor cell adherence - an in vivo model-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10350-004-6624-z-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Surgery publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.