Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/106061
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Prevalence of functional bowel disorders and faecal incontinence: an Australian primary care survey
Author: Ng, K.-S.
Nassar, N.
Hamd, K.
Nagarajah, A.
Gladman, M.
Citation: Colorectal Disease, 2015; 17(2):150-159
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell
Issue Date: 2015
ISSN: 1462-8910
1463-1318
Statement of
Responsibility: 
K.-S. Ng, N. Nassar, K. Hamd, A. Nagarajah and M. A. Gladman
Abstract: Aim: Interest in functional bowel disorders (FBDs) and faecal incontinence (FI) has increased amongst coloproctologists. The study aimed to assess the prevalence of FBDs and FI (including its severity) among Australian primary healthcare seekers using objective criteria. Method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a primary care setting in Sydney, Australia. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect demographic information and diagnose FBDs (irritable bowel syndrome, constipation, functional bloating and functional diarrhoea) based on Rome III criteria. The severity of FI was determined using the Vaizey incontinence score. Associations with medical/surgical history and healthcare utilization were assessed. Results: Of 596 subjects approached, 396 (66.4%) agreed to participate. Overall, 33% had FBD and/or FI. Irritable bowel syndrome was present in 11.1% and these participants were more likely to report anxiety/depression (P < 0.01) and to have had a previous colonoscopy (P < 0.001) or cholecystectomy (P = 0.02). Functional constipation was present in 8.1%, and functional bloating and functional diarrhoea were diagnosed in 6.1%, and 1.5%, respectively. FI was present in 12.1% with the majority (52%) reporting moderate/severe incontinence (Vaizey score > 8). Participants with FI were more likely to have irritable bowel syndrome, urinary incontinence and previous anal surgery (P < 0.01). Conclusion: FBDs and FI are prevalent conditions amongst primary healthcare seekers and the needs of those affected appear to be complex given their coexisting symptoms and conditions. Currently, the majority do not reach colorectal services, although increased awareness by primary care providers could lead to sufferers being referred for specialist management.
Keywords: Colonic diseases
Description: Accepted Article online 30 October 2014. The copyright line for this article was changed on 14 February, 2017 after original online publication.
Rights: © 2014 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12808
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/632955
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/codi.12808
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Surgery publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_106061.pdfPublished Version194.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.