Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/106959
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuckley, E.-
dc.contributor.authorFarshid, G.-
dc.contributor.authorGill, G.-
dc.contributor.authorKollias, J.-
dc.contributor.authorKoczwara, B.-
dc.contributor.authorKarapetis, C.-
dc.contributor.authorAdams, J.-
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, R.-
dc.contributor.authorKeefe, D.-
dc.contributor.authorNiyonsenga, T.-
dc.contributor.authorPowell, K.-
dc.contributor.authorFusco, K.-
dc.contributor.authorEckert, M.-
dc.contributor.authorBeckmann, K.-
dc.contributor.authorRoder, D.-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Cancer Care, 2017; 26(4):e12673-1-e12673-8-
dc.identifier.issn0961-5423-
dc.identifier.issn1365-2354-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/106959-
dc.description.abstractMonitoring screening mammography effects in small areas is often limited by small numbers of deaths and delayed effects. We developed a risk score for breast cancer death to circumvent these limitations. Screening, if effective, would increase post-diagnostic survivals through lead-time and related effects, as well as mortality reductions. Linked cancer and BreastScreen data at four hospitals (n = 2,039) were used to investigate whether screened cases had higher recorded survivals in 13 small areas, using breast cancer deaths as the outcome (M1), and a risk of death score derived from TNM stage, grade, histology type, hormone receptor status, and related variables (M2). M1 indicated lower risk of death in screened cases in 12 of the 13 areas, achieving statistical significance (p < .05) in 5. M2 indicated lower risk scores in screened cases in all 13 areas, achieving statistical significance in 12. For cases recently screened at diagnosis (<6 months), statistically significant reductions applied in 8 areas (M1) and all 13 areas (M2). Screening effects are more detectable in small areas using these risk scores than death itself as the outcome variable. An added advantage is the application of risk scores for providing a marker of screening effect soon after diagnosis.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityE. Buckley G. Farshid, G. Gill, J. Kollias, B. Koczwara, C. Karapetis, J. Adams, R. Joshi, D. Keefe, T. Niyonsenga, K. Powell, K. Fusco, M. Eckert, K. Beckmann, D. Roder-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.rights© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12673-
dc.subjectbreast screening-
dc.subjecteffect monitoring-
dc.subjectsmall areas-
dc.titleAssessing impact of organised breast screening across small residential areas-development and internal validation of a prediction model-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ecc.12673-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBuckley, E. [0000-0001-8980-1194]-
dc.identifier.orcidFarshid, G. [0000-0002-2056-0561]-
dc.identifier.orcidGill, G. [0000-0001-7310-2970]-
dc.identifier.orcidJoshi, R. [0000-0003-4607-3937]-
dc.identifier.orcidKeefe, D. [0000-0001-9377-431X]-
dc.identifier.orcidFusco, K. [0000-0002-5965-1364]-
dc.identifier.orcidRoder, D. [0000-0001-6442-4409]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Pathology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.