Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/107447
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Babie, P. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Property Law Review, 2016; 6(2):144-148 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1838-3858 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/107447 | - |
dc.description.abstract | While disputes involving State and Territory residential tenancies legislation rarely raise fundamental points, Schaffer v Usca offers a rare opportunity to consider the substantive content of a residential tenancy pursuant to the Residential Tenancies Act 1995 (SA). The case found that circumstances can arise pursuant to the Residential Tenancies Act in which non-typical payments of valuable consideration, in this case the payment of water rates, may be sufficient to establish a residential tenancy. In coming to that conclusion, Schaffer provides a useful review of the nature of a residential tenancy pursuant to State and Territory residential tenancies legislation. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Paul Babie | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Thomson Reuters | - |
dc.rights | Copyright Status Unknown | - |
dc.source.uri | http://www.westlaw.com.au/maf/wlau/app/document?docguid=I0ec16d65bdd511e6b606e78a75e9f1e9&tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&isTocNav=true&startChunk=1&endChunk=1 | - |
dc.title | South Australia: the meaning of "Residential Tenancy Agreement" in South Australia: Schaffer v USCA | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Babie, P. [0000-0002-9616-3300] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 3 Law publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.