Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/107447
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBabie, P.-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationProperty Law Review, 2016; 6(2):144-148-
dc.identifier.issn1838-3858-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/107447-
dc.description.abstractWhile disputes involving State and Territory residential tenancies legislation rarely raise fundamental points, Schaffer v Usca offers a rare opportunity to consider the substantive content of a residential tenancy pursuant to the Residential Tenancies Act 1995 (SA). The case found that circumstances can arise pursuant to the Residential Tenancies Act in which non-typical payments of valuable consideration, in this case the payment of water rates, may be sufficient to establish a residential tenancy. In coming to that conclusion, Schaffer provides a useful review of the nature of a residential tenancy pursuant to State and Territory residential tenancies legislation.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityPaul Babie-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherThomson Reuters-
dc.rightsCopyright Status Unknown-
dc.source.urihttp://www.westlaw.com.au/maf/wlau/app/document?docguid=I0ec16d65bdd511e6b606e78a75e9f1e9&tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&isTocNav=true&startChunk=1&endChunk=1-
dc.titleSouth Australia: the meaning of "Residential Tenancy Agreement" in South Australia: Schaffer v USCA-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBabie, P. [0000-0002-9616-3300]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.