Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/107628
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, G.-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Property Law Journal, 2011; 20(1):58-69-
dc.identifier.issn1038-5959-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/107628-
dc.description.abstractThe Court of Appeal for Victoria has recently decided in Nolan v MBF Investments that human rights law does not apply to mortgagees’ sales. This article examines the court’s reasons for so deciding and finds them deficient, because human rights do sometimes apply in the private law; but their conclusion is ultimately correct, as this is one of the instances in which such rights would not be appropriately applied to private parties.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGregory Taylor-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherLexisNexis-
dc.rightsCopyright status unknown-
dc.source.urihttp://www.lexisnexis.com.proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/au/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=53SG-MMC1-DY6R-W0BJ&csi=267869&oc=00240&perma=true-
dc.titleInternational law and mortgagee sales - continued-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidTaylor, G. [0000-0002-9393-9134]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.