Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/108255
Type: Journal article
Title: Should the practical benefit principle extend to contract formation?
Author: Giancaspro, M.
Citation: Australian Business Law Review, 2014; 42:389-398
Publisher: Thomson Reuters
Issue Date: 2014
ISSN: 0310-1053
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Mark Giancaspro
Abstract: In 2012 the Federal Government commenced a comprehensive review of the Australian law of contract, with the aim of identifying those aspects of this legal framework which were not conducive to its efficient and effective operation for businesses and consumers. This article seeks to add to this live discussion by contemplating whether the highly controversial practical benefit principle, famously expressed by the English Court of Appeal in Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1, should apply not only to contract variations but also to contract formation. It is argued on three grounds that, if the principle remains an established feature of the doctrine of consideration in this jurisdiction, the principle should not be extended in this manner as this will only give rise to issues of the kind being targeted in the government's review.
Rights: ©Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited.
Published version: https://www.westlaw.com.au/maf/wlau/app/document?docguid=I1cf091d8534e11e4bb6fec5fe3bc7087&tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&isTocNav=true&startChunk=1&endChunk=1
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Law publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_108255.pdf
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access64.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.