Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/109343
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, G.-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Constitutional Law, 2017; 15(3):734-752-
dc.identifier.issn1474-2640-
dc.identifier.issn1474-2659-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/109343-
dc.description.abstractGermany is often thought of as home to the hurdle or threshold requirement: parties that fail to obtain 5 percent of the votes in an election are excluded from sitting in Parliament. This idea has been widely copied throughout the world, although the five-percent threshold has not been implemented everywhere, and other variations on the theme exist. Recently, however, doubts have started to emerge in Germany itself about the hurdle. It remains constitutionally valid in federal and state elections, but the Federal Constitutional Court has recently held it invalid in European elections. Its decision deserves endorsement, although it had a range of justifications for holding the hurdle invalid-some remarkably insightful, some rather less praiseworthy.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGreg Taylor-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.rights© The Author 2017. Oxford University Press and New York University School of Law. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox050-
dc.titleThe constitutionality of election thresholds in Germany-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/icon/mox050-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidTaylor, G. [0000-0002-9393-9134]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Law publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_109343.pdfAccepted version493.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.