Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/109549
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Appleby, G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | McDonald, S. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Legal Ethics, 2017; 20(1):89-114 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1460-728X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1757-8450 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/109549 | - |
dc.description | Published Online: 7 December 2016 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Justice must both be done and be seen to be done. A legal principle designed to give effect to this fundamental proposition is that a judge must not sit to determine a dispute if he or she is biased, or if there exists a reasonable perception that he or she is biased. Across many common law jurisdictions – including the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and many jurisdictions in the United States – the judge in question himself or herself is required to undertake the assessment of whether bias, or an apprehension of bias, exists. Drawing on insights from behavioural psychology and a series of case studies from across these jurisdictions, this paper offers an extended analysis of this practice and identifies and evaluates alternative proposals. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Gabrielle Appleby and Stephen McDonaldc | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | - |
dc.rights | © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1261521 | - |
dc.subject | Judicial ethics; recusal; bias | - |
dc.title | Pride and prejudice: a case for reform of judicial recusal procedure | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/1460728x.2017.1261521 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 3 Law publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
RA_hdl_109549.pdf Restricted Access | Restricted Access | 2.03 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.