Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/109698
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStorm, L.-
dc.contributor.authorGoretzki, M.-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Transpersonal Psychology, 2016; 48(2):190-209-
dc.identifier.issn0022-524X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/109698-
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we propose that the Spiritual Emergency Scale (SES) was not designed to measure a state of spiritual emergence, but measures exactly what the title suggests; namely spiritual emergency. On the one hand, SES scores indicate states of spiritual emergency as is most clearly indicated by the references to emergency in the form of keywords, terms, and phrases embedded in SES items. On the other hand, to infer that ‘emergence’ is ongoing, or is a fait accompli, simply on the basis of SES item responses, would be misleading. The authors also contrast the single-factor solution of spiritual emergency with two different four-factor solutions.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLance Storm, Monika Goretzki-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherTranspersonal Institute-
dc.rightsCopyright © 2016 Transpersonal Institute-
dc.source.urihttp://www.atpweb.org/journal.aspx-
dc.subjectSpiritual emergency; spiritual emergency scale; spirituality; psychosis-
dc.titleA defense of the Spiritual Emergency Scale: emergency vs. emergence-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidStorm, L. [0000-0002-6228-6150]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.