Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/110112
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSiramanna, P.-
dc.contributor.authorGladman, M.-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationANZ Journal of Surgery, 2017; 87(10):760-766-
dc.identifier.issn1445-1433-
dc.identifier.issn1445-2197-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/110112-
dc.descriptionThis paper was presented at the 10th Annual Academic Surgical Congress (ASC), 3–5 February 2015 in Las Vegas, NV, USA.-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Proficiency-based virtual reality (VR) training curricula improve intraoperative performance, but have not been developed for laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA). This study aimed to develop an evidence-based training curriculum for LA. Methods: A total of 10 experienced (>50 LAs), eight intermediate (10–30 LAs) and 20 inexperienced (<10 LAs) operators performed guided and unguided LA tasks on a high-fidelity VR simulator using internationally relevant techniques. The ability to differentiate levels of experience (construct validity) was measured using simulator-derived metrics. Learning curves were analysed. Proficiency benchmarks were defined by the performance of the experienced group. Intermediate and experienced participants completed a questionnaire to evaluate the realism (face validity) and relevance (content validity). Results: Of 18 surgeons, 16 (89%) considered the VR model to be visually realistic and 17 (95%) believed that it was representative of actual practice. All ‘guided’ modules demonstrated construct validity (P < 0.05), with learning curves that plateaued between sessions 6 and 9 (P < 0.01). When comparing inexperienced to intermediates to experienced, the ‘unguided’ LA module demonstrated construct validity for economy of motion (5.00 versus 7.17 versus 7.84, respectively; P < 0.01) and task time (864.5 s versus 477.2 s versus 352.1 s, respectively, P < 0.01). Construct validity was also confirmed for number of movements, path length and idle time. Validated modules were used for curriculum construction, with proficiency benchmarks used as performance goals. Conclusion: A VR LA model was realistic and representative of actual practice and was validated as a training and assessment tool. Consequently, the first evidence-based internationally applicable training curriculum for LA was constructed, which facilitates skill acquisition to proficiency.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityPramudith Sirimanna and Marc A. Gladman-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.rights© 2017 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.14135-
dc.subjectLaparoscopic appendicectomy; proficiency training; surgical education; technical skills curriculum; virtual reality simulation-
dc.titleDevelopment of a proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ans.14135-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1093784-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidGladman, M. [0000-0001-8412-9570]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Surgery publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_110112.pdfSubmitted Version830.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.