Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/115155
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaambwa, B.-
dc.contributor.authorRatcliffe, J.-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationThe Patient: Patient Centered Outcomes Research, 2018; 11(1):39-54-
dc.identifier.issn1178-1653-
dc.identifier.issn1178-1661-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/115155-
dc.descriptionPublished online: 16 June 2017-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objective: Economic evaluation of healthcare treatment and services targeted at older people requires measurement of utility-based quality-of-life outcomes but it is not always possible to collect such outcome data. It may, however, be possible to estimate these outcomes using non-utility measures of quality of life where the latter have been collected. The objective of this study was to develop a regression-based algorithm to map a non-utility-based outcome, the Older People’s Quality of Life brief questionnaire (OPQoL-brief), onto a utility-based outcome, the EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L). Methods: The estimation sample comprised 330 community-based Australian older people (>65 years), while the validation sample consisted of 293 older people from a separate study. Six regression techniques were employed to estimate utilities from OPQoL-brief. The predictive accuracy of 54 regression models (six regression techniques × nine model specifications) was assessed using six criteria: mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), correlation, distribution of predicted utilities, distribution of residuals, and proportion of predictions with absolute errors <0.05. Results: The 54 regression models predicted EQ-5D-5L utilities that performed differently when assessed by the six criteria. However, best results were obtained from an ordinary least squares (OLS) model where all 13 OPQoL-brief items were included as continuous variables (OLS 4). RMSE and MAE estimates for this model (0.2201 and 0.1638, respectively) were within the range of published estimates. Conclusions: It is possible to predict valid utilities from OPQoL-brief using regression methods. We recommend OLS model (4) for this exercise.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityBillingsley Kaambwa, Julie Ratcliffe-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishing-
dc.rights© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0259-3-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectActivities of Daily Living-
dc.subjectLogistic Models-
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results-
dc.subjectInterpersonal Relations-
dc.subjectMental Health-
dc.subjectHealth Status-
dc.subjectAlgorithms-
dc.subjectQuality-Adjusted Life Years-
dc.subjectQuality of Life-
dc.subjectSocioeconomic Factors-
dc.subjectAged-
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over-
dc.subjectHealth Services for the Aged-
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysis-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectMobility Limitation-
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires-
dc.titlePredicting EuroQoL 5 dimensions 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) utilities from Older People’s Quality of Life brief questionnaire (OPQoL-brief) scores-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40271-017-0259-3-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP110200079-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidKaambwa, B. [0000-0002-2128-3404]-
dc.identifier.orcidRatcliffe, J. [0000-0001-7365-1988]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.