Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/12209
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Antipredator mechanisms of Australian frogs |
Author: | Williams, C. Brodie Jr, E. Tyler, M. Walker, S. |
Citation: | Journal of Herpetology, 2000; 34(3):431-443 |
Publisher: | Soc Study Amphibians Reptiles |
Issue Date: | 2000 |
ISSN: | 0022-1511 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Craig R. Williams, Edmund D. Brodie, Jr., Michael J. Tyler, and Steven J. Walker |
Abstract: | We examined the antipredator mechanisms of 19 Australian hylid species (two genera) and 23 myobatrachid species (nine genera). Frogs of 39 of the 42 species exhibited one or more defensive mechanisms (other than escape), including postures, bright coloration, adhesive skin secretions, and/or calls. Defensive posturing occurred in individuals of 38 species, and varied in relationship to morphology and localization of skin glands. Bright colors, when present, typically were displayed during defensive postures. We documented dramatic geographic variation in the antipredator display of one species, Limnodynates tasmaniensis. Defensive postures were accompanied by secretions from dorsal skin glands. These secretions were sometimes associated with a distinctive odor. Adhesive skin secretions were present in burrowing frogs of three genera. Defensive calls were emitted by most hylids but none of the myobatrachids. We offer a hypothesis of mimicry to explain the behavior pattern of exposing the bold black and white ventral surface in Pseudophryne and Crinia species. |
Rights: | Journal of Herpetology © 2000 |
DOI: | 10.2307/1565367 |
Published version: | http://www.jstor.org/stable/1565367 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 2 Ecology, Evolution and Landscape Science publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.