Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/129292
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPamment, Alex-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/129292-
dc.descriptionThis item is only available electronically.en
dc.description.abstractStress has a strong influence on learning, particularly about positive and negative outcomes. However, it is unclear whether stress enhances or disrupts learning about positive and negative outcomes due to inconsistent findings in the literature. There is a possibility that stress affects learning from appetitive and aversive prediction errors. Prediction error refers to the discrepancy between observed and expected outcomes. This discrepancy is considered to be crucial to generate new learning. To test this, a blocking design was used to assess learning from prediction errors in stressful versus non-stressful conditions. A blocking design consists of learning about a stimulus (e.g. X) that is reduced if it is paired with another stimulus (e.g. A) that is a better predictor of the outcome (e.g. A  outcome; AX  outcome). The outcome is not surprising on AX trials because A has already been associated with the outcome; therefore the prediction error is small and this reduces learning about X. X is a redundant predictor of the outcome, so learning about it should be blocked. Results show that learning about the blocked stimulus was reduced under threat but only for positive outcomes. This seems to indicate that learning is streamlined under threat where only relevant stimuli with positive outcomes are focused on. In safe conditions and for negative outcomes, more general learning is used.en
dc.subjectHonours; Psychologyen
dc.titleThe Impact of Stress on Learning: Exploring How Stress Changes Learning about Positive and Negative Outcomes and the Role of Anxietyen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Psychology-
dc.provenanceThis electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals-
dc.description.dissertationThesis (B.PsychSc(Hons)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2018-
Appears in Collections:School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PammentA_2018_Hons.pdf1.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.