Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/132199
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSturman, D.-
dc.contributor.authorWiggins, M.-
dc.contributor.authorAuton, J.C.-
dc.contributor.authorWilliam, H.-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationErgonomics: an international journal of research and practice in human factors and ergonomics, 2019; 63(1):48-60-
dc.identifier.issn0014-0139-
dc.identifier.issn1366-5847-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/132199-
dc.description.abstractThis research was designed to determine whether qualified practitioners’ cue utilisation is predictive of their performance during a sustained visual search task in an operational context. Australian Distribution Network Service Provider (DNSP) operators were recruited for two experiments, and were classified with either higher or lower cue utilisation based on an assessment of cue utilisation within the context of power distribution. Operators’ performance was assessed using a domain-related sustained visual search task. In both experiments, power distribution operators with higher cue utilisation demonstrated shorter mean response latencies during the sustained visual search task, compared to operators with lower cue utilisation. Further, no differences in accuracy based on cue utilisation were observed during the sustained visual search task. The results are consistent with the proposition that power operators with higher cue utilisation have a greater capacity to sustain visual search during domain-related tasks, compared to operators with lower cue utilisation. Practitioner summary: Power distribution system operators’ cue utilisation was used to predict performance during a domain-related sustained visual search task. Power distribution operators with higher cue utilisation demonstrated shorter mean response latencies during the sustained visual search task, but no differences in accuracy, compared to operators with lower cue utilisation. Abbreviations: DNSP: distribution network service provider; EXPERTise 2.0: EXPERT intensive skills evaluation; FAT: feature association task; FDT: feature discrimination task; FIT: feature identification task; fNIRS: functional near infrared spectroscopy; FPT: feature prioritisation task; FRT: feature recognition task; SCADA: supervisory control and data acquisition-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDaniel Sturman, Mark W. Wiggins, Jaime C. Auton and William S. Helton-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis-
dc.rights© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2019.1680873-
dc.subjectCue utilisation; power distribution; sustained visual search; cognitive load-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshCues-
dc.subject.meshDecision Making-
dc.subject.meshTask Performance and Analysis-
dc.subject.meshReaction Time-
dc.subject.meshAviation-
dc.subject.meshRailroads-
dc.subject.meshAdult-
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.meshFemale-
dc.subject.meshMale-
dc.titleCue utilisation predicts control room operators’ performance in a sustained visual search task-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00140139.2019.1680873-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP160100211-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidSturman, D. [0000-0002-5025-598X]-
Appears in Collections:Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.