Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/132299
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer |
Author: | Forbes, C.C. Finlay, A. McIntosh, M. Siddiquee, S. Short, C.E. |
Citation: | Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2019; 13(1):75-96 |
Publisher: | Springer |
Issue Date: | 2019 |
ISSN: | 1932-2259 1932-2267 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Cynthia C. Forbes, Amy Finlay, Megan McIntosh, Shihab Siddiquee and Camille E. Short |
Abstract: | PURPOSE:To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting prostate cancer survivors (PCS). METHODS:Studies were identified through structured searches of PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases, and bibliographic review. Inclusion criteria were (1) examined feasibility, acceptability, or efficacy of an online intervention designed to improve supportive care outcomes for PCS; (2) presented outcome data collected from PCS separately (if mixed cancer); and (3) evaluated efficacy outcomes using randomized controlled trial (RCT) design. RESULTS:Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria; ten were classified as RCTs. Overall, 2446 men (average age 64 years) were included. Studies reported on the following outcomes: feasibility and acceptability of an online intervention (e.g., patient support, online medical record/follow-ups, or decision aids); reducing decisional conflict/distress; improving cancer-related distress and health-related quality of life; and satisfaction with cancer care. CONCLUSION:We found good preliminary evidence for online supportive care among PCS, but little high level evidence. Generally, the samples were small and unrepresentative. Further, inadequate acceptability measures made it difficult to determine actual PCS acceptability and satisfaction, and lack of control groups precluded strong conclusions regarding efficacy. Translation also appears minimal; few interventions are still publicly available. Larger trials with appropriate control groups and greater emphasis on translation of effective interventions is recommended. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS:Prostate cancer survivors have a variety of unmet supportive care needs. Using online delivery to improve the reach of high-quality supportive care programs could have a positive impact on health-related quality of life among PCS. |
Keywords: | Cancer care Cancer services Digital health Men’s health Well-being |
Rights: | © The Author(s) 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11764-018-0729-1 |
Grant ID: | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1090517 |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-018-0729-1 |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hdl_132299.pdf | Published version | 868.53 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.