Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/134804
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Conference paper
Title: Uncertainty, sensitivity and scenario analysis: how do they fit together?
Author: Maier, H.R.
Guillaume, J.H.A.
McPhail, C.
Westra, S.
Kwakkel, J.H.
Razavi, S.
van Delden, H.
Thyer, M.A.
Culley, S.A.
Jakeman, A.J.
Citation: Proceedings of the 24th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2021), 2021, pp.554-560
Publisher: Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand
Publisher Place: Canberra, ACT, Australia
Issue Date: 2021
ISBN: 9780987214386
ISSN: 2981-8001
Conference Name: International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (5 Dec 2021 - 10 Dec 2021 : Sydney, NSW, Australia)
Statement of
Responsibility: 
H.R. Maier, J.H.A. Guillaume, C. McPhail, S. Westra, J.H. Kwakkel, S. Razavi, H. van Delden, M.A. Thyer, S.A. Culley and A.J. Jakeman
Abstract: Dealing with uncertainty is becoming increasingly important in model-based decision support. Various methods have been developed in order to do this, including uncertainty, sensitivity and scenario analysis. Although these different methods serve their purpose, the availability of a large number of methods can make it difficult for practitioners to understand the similarities and differences between them and when the use of one is more suitable than another, resulting in confusion. In addition, researchers often identify with belonging to a group dealing with a particular approach, which can lead to a lack of crossfertilisation and understanding. In order to assist with bridging the gap between researchers working on different approaches to dealing with uncertainty and eliminate confusion for practitioners, the objective of this paper is to examine the relationship between uncertainty, sensitivity and scenario analysis in the context of model-based decision support, and to take the first steps towards establishing common ground between these methods and assess the contexts under which they are most suitable. This is achieved by conceptualising the various methods as different approaches to “sampling” the hyperspace of model inputs, although this is done from different perspectives and for different ends (Figure 1). It is therefore also necessary to think about the assumptions each method is making about the space being explored, and there are benefits to be gained in thinking about how best to sample the space for each purpose. The approaches identified in this conference paper provide a first level of coarse characterisations. Further refinements in categorisation is possible (with the differentiation between narrative and stress testing scenarios as a first example), and likely to be useful. There are connections to be made to other disciplines, such as philosophy and decision theory, regarding the assumptions each method makes.
Keywords: Uncertainty analysis; sensitivity analysis; scenario analysis; sampling; guidance
Description: Session J5. Advances and applications in decision making in the face of multiple plausible futures
Rights: These proceedings are licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International CC BY License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you attribute MSSANZ and the original author(s) and source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made. Images or other third party material are included in this licence, unless otherwise indicated in a credit line to the material. Individual MODSIM papers are copyright of the Authors and Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc. (MSSANZ). MSSANZ is the publisher of the MODSIM Proceedings.
DOI: 10.36334/modsim.2021.j5.maier
Published version: https://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim2021/papersbysession.html
Appears in Collections:Civil and Environmental Engineering publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_134804.pdfPublished version2.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.