Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/134858
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHaji, A.A.-
dc.contributor.authorCoram, P.-
dc.contributor.authorTroshani, I.-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationAccounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2023; 36(1):177-208-
dc.identifier.issn0951-3574-
dc.identifier.issn1758-4205-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/134858-
dc.descriptionArticle publication date: 7 April 2022-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – This study reviews research that examines economic and behavioural consequences of CSR reporting regulations. Specifically, the authors evaluate the impact of CSR reporting regulations on (1) reporting quality, (2) capital-markets and (3) firm behaviour. Design/methodology/approach – The authors first describe the stated objectives and enforcement level of CSR reporting regulations around the world. Second, the authors review over 130 archival studies in accounting, finance, economics, law and management that examine consequences of the regulations. Findings – The stated objectives and enforcement of CSR reporting regulations vary considerably across countries. Empirical research finds no significant changes in reporting quality and generally concludes that CSR reporting continues to be ceremonial rather than substantive after the regulations – consistent with corporate legitimation and “greenwashing” views. In contrast, growing evidence shows both positive and negative capital-market and real effects of the regulations. Overall, the findings from this review indicate that, on balance, there remains a significant number of questions on the net effects of CSR reporting regulations. Originality/value – The authors offer a comprehensive review of the literature examining consequences of CSR reporting regulations. The authors identify apparent tensions in studies assessing different outcomes after the regulations: between symbolic reporting and positive capital-market outcomes; between profitability and CSR; and between CSR and the welfare of non-shareholder groups. Additionally, we highlight differences in the scope and stated objectives of CSR regulations across countries, with the regulations often reflecting socioeconomic development and national interests of implementing countries. Collectively, our review indicates that institutional details are crucial when considering the design or consequences of CSR reporting regulations and/ or standards.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAbdifatah Ahmed Haji, Paul Coram and Indrit Troshani-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherEmerald Publishing-
dc.rights© Emerald Publishing Limited-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-05-2020-4571-
dc.subjectCSR; Sustainability; Reporting regulation; Reporting quality; Economic consequences; Real effects; Welfare implications-
dc.titleConsequences of CSR reporting regulations worldwide: a review and research agenda-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/aaaj-05-2020-4571-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidCoram, P. [0000-0003-3942-1497]-
dc.identifier.orcidTroshani, I. [0000-0002-4266-2833]-
Appears in Collections:Business School publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.