Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/135128
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chappel, S.E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Naweed, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chapman, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vandelanotte, C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Holtermann, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Straker, L. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Ergonomics: an international journal of research and practice in human factors and ergonomics, 2023; 66(2):153-166 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0014-0139 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1366-5847 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2440/135128 | - |
dc.description | Published online: 05 May 2022 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to assess occupational health professionals’ application of the Goldilocks Work Paradigm in redesigning jobs for healthier physical behaviours while maintaining productivity. During a group simulation exercise, participants (n¼16) created job descriptions for four different occupation cases (factory worker, office worker, teacher, train driver) and then redesigned the jobs using the Paradigm. Substantial changes in the time spent in sitting (9–30%), standing (8–42%), walking (6–14%), and high-intensity (0–24%) physical behaviours were achieved, which if implemented would likely result in enhanced health for workers. Overall, occupational health professionals were able to successfully redesign fictitious jobs aligned with the Goldilocks Work Paradigm. The simulation task used in this study may be useful to train professionals and assist workplaces to understand and implement the Goldilocks Work Paradigm into practice. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Stephanie E. Chappela, Anjum Naweeda, Janine Chapmana, Corneel Vandelanottec, Andreas Holtermannd and Leon Strakere | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Informa UK | - |
dc.rights | © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2022.2067357 | - |
dc.subject | Job design | - |
dc.subject | occupational physical activity | - |
dc.subject | Goldilocks | - |
dc.subject | occupational health | - |
dc.subject | simulation task | - |
dc.title | Can occupational health professionals successfully apply the Goldilocks Work Paradigm in a simulated work redesign? | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00140139.2022.2067357 | - |
dc.relation.grant | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP200103570 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Chapman, J. [0000-0002-9202-9788] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.