Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/135525
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Page, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vira, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ledger, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mosen, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Anderson, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Charteris, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Boyle, C. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Education Policy, 2022; 38(5):870-889 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0268-0939 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1464-5106 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2440/135525 | - |
dc.description | Published online: 26 May 2022 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) offers a global blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for every person, through universal action to address social, economic, and environmental inequity and inequality (United Nations Development Programme, 2021). For educators, SDG Goal 4 aims to ensure an equitable quality education that promotes lifelong learning opportunities and this goal has been endorsed by Pacific United Nations States in order to pave the road towards an inclusive education for all. We wish to argue, however, that attempting to meet global development goals for inclusive education is fundamentally problematic because of the nuances of the regions and contexts. For example, Pacific states, might better benefit from its own inclusive education trajectory that reflects individual contexts and understanding of distinct educational complexities. We propose the alignment of the global goals that positions local discourses of knowledge, values and understanding alongside inclusive education frameworks. The Pacific Disability Model offers a third space for disability discussions and actions that intersects global and local policy and practice binaries. By doing so, it is hoped that an inclusive approach to education can reach its potential for all, and particularly, students with disabilities in Pacific nations. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Angela Page, Angelinah Vira, Susan Ledger, Joanne Mosen, Joanna Anderson, Jennifer Charteris and Christopher Boyle | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) | - |
dc.rights | © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2022.2080275 | - |
dc.subject | Relationality; Pacific disability model; SDG goal 4; sustainability; inclusive education | - |
dc.title | Pacific inclusive education model: addressing dichotomies to ensure positive outcomes | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/02680939.2022.2080275 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Boyle, C. [0000-0001-6196-7619] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Education publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hdl_135525.pdf | Published version | 1.05 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.