Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/136175
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Vitrification within a nanoliter volume: oocyte and embryo cryopreservation within a 3D photopolymerized device
Author: Yagoub, S.H.
Lim, M.
Tan, T.C.Y.
Chow, D.J.X.
Dholakia, K.
Gibson, B.C.
Thompson, J.G.
Dunning, K.R.
Citation: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2022; 39(9):1997-2014
Publisher: Springer
Issue Date: 2022
ISSN: 1058-0468
1573-7330
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Suliman H. Yagoub, Megan Lim, Tiffany C. Y. Tan, Darren J. X. Chow, Kishan Dholakia, Brant C. Gibson, Jeremy G. Thompson, Kylie R. Dunning
Abstract: Purpose: Vitrification permits long-term banking of oocytes and embryos. It is a technically challenging procedure requiring direct handling and movement of cells between potentially cytotoxic cryoprotectant solutions. Variation in adherence to timing, and ability to trace cells during the procedure, affects survival post-warming. We hypothesized that minimizing direct handling will simplify the procedure and improve traceability. To address this, we present a novel photopolymerized device that houses the sample during vitrification. Methods: The fabricated device consisted of two components: the Pod and Garage. Single mouse oocytes or embryos were housed in a Pod, with multiple Pods docked into a Garage. The suitability of the device for cryogenic application was assessed by repeated vitrification and warming cycles. Oocytes or early blastocyst-stage embryos were vitrified either using standard practice or within Pods and a Garage and compared to non-vitrified control groups. Post-warming, we assessed survival rate, oocyte developmental potential (fertilization and subsequent development) and metabolism (autofluorescence). Results: Vitrification within the device occurred within ~ 3 nL of cryoprotectant: this volume being ~ 1000-fold lower than standard vitrification. Compared to standard practice, vitrification and warming within our device showed no differences in viability, developmental competency, or metabolism for oocytes and embryos. The device housed the sample during processing, which improved traceability and minimized handling. Interestingly, vitrification-warming itself, altered oocyte and embryo metabolism. Conclusion: The Pod and Garage system minimized the volume of cryoprotectant at vitrification—by ~ 1000-fold—improved traceability and reduced direct handling of the sample. This is a major step in simplifying the procedure.
Keywords: 3D fabrication
Embryo
IVF
Metabolism
Oocyte
Photopolymerization
Vitrification
Description: Corrected by: Correction to: Vitrification within a nanoliter volume: oocyte and embryo cryopreservation within a 3D photopolymerized device, in Vol. 39(10):2435 2022. The correct wavelength of the laser used to excite an intracellular fluorophore should be “405 nm” and not “305 nm”. The original article has been corrected.
Rights: © The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creativecommons. org/ licenses/ by/4. 0/.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02589-8
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE140100003
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02589-8
Appears in Collections:Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_136175.pdfPublished version14.53 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.