Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/137641
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilson, M.T.-
dc.contributor.authorGoldsworthy, M.-
dc.contributor.authorVallence, A.-M.-
dc.contributor.authorFornito, A.-
dc.contributor.authorRogasch, N.-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationBrain Research, 2023; 1801:148205-1-148205-14-
dc.identifier.issn0006-8993-
dc.identifier.issn1872-6240-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/137641-
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to use measured input-output (IO) data to identify the best fitting model for motor evoked potentials. Methods: We analyzed existing IO data before and after intermittent and continuous theta-burst stimulation (iTBS & cTBS) from a small group of subjects (18 for each). We fitted individual synaptic couplings and sensitivity parameters using variations of a biophysical model. A best performing model was selected and analyzed. Results: cTBS gives a broad reduction in MEPs for amplitudes larger than resting motor threshold (RMT). Close to threshold, iTBS gives strong potentiation. The model captures individual IO curves. There is no change to the population average synaptic weights post TBS but the change in excitatory-to-excitatory synaptic coupling is strongly correlated with the experimental post-TBS response relative to baseline. Conclusions: The model describes population-averaged and individual IO curves, and their post-TBS change. Variation among individuals is accounted for with variation in synaptic couplings, and variation in sensitivity of neural response to stimulation. Significance: The best fitting model could be applied more broadly and validation studies could elucidate underlying biophysical meaning of parameters.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMarcus T. Wilson, Mitchell R. Goldsworthy, Ann-Maree Vallence, Alex Fornito, Nigel C. Rogasch-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.rights© 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148205-
dc.subjectMotor Evoked Potential-
dc.subjecttranscranial magnetic stimulation-
dc.subjectcortical plasticity-
dc.subjectmodeling-
dc.subjectneural field theory-
dc.subjecttheta burst stimulation-
dc.subject.meshMotor Cortex-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshTheta Rhythm-
dc.subject.meshBiophysics-
dc.subject.meshEvoked Potentials, Motor-
dc.subject.meshNeuronal Plasticity-
dc.subject.meshTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation-
dc.titleFinding Synaptic Couplings from a Biophysical Model of Motor Evoked Potentials after Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148205-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE180100741-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE200100575-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE190100694-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1197431-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1146292-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP200103509-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidGoldsworthy, M. [0000-0002-0688-9475]-
dc.identifier.orcidRogasch, N. [0000-0002-4484-1069]-
Appears in Collections:Molecular and Biomedical Science publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.