Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/137886
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Gender-specific effects of COVID-19 lockdowns on scientific publishing productivity: Impact and resilience
Author: Ryan, M.
Tuke, J.
Hutchinson, M.R.
Spencer, S.J.
Citation: Social Science and Medicine, 2023; 320:115761-1-115761-9
Publisher: Elsevier
Issue Date: 2023
ISSN: 0277-9536
1873-5347
Statement of
Responsibility: 
M. Ryan, J. Tuke, M.R. Hutchinson, S.J. Spencer
Abstract: Rationale: The SARS-CoV2 pandemic led to drastic social restrictions globally. Early data suggest that women in science have been more adversely affected by these lockdowns than men, with relatively fewer scientific articles authored by women. However, these observations test broad populations with many potential causes of disparity. Australia presents a natural experimental condition where several states of similar demographics and disease impact had differing approaches in their social isolation strategies. The state of Victoria experienced 280 days of lockdowns from 2020 to 2021, whereas the comparable state of New South Wales experienced 107 days, most of these in 2021, and other states even fewer restrictions. Objective and methods: To assess how the gender balance changed in Australian biomedical publishing with the lockdowns, we created a custom workflow to analyse PubMed data from more than 120,000 published articles submitted in 2019–2021 from Australian authors. Results: Broadly, Australian women have been incredibly resilient to the challenges faced by the lockdowns. There was an increase in the number of published articles submitted in 2020 that was equally due to women as men, including from Victoria. On the other hand, articles specifically addressing COVID-19 were significantly less likely to be authored by women than those on other topics, a finding not likely due to particular gender imbalance in virology or viral epidemiology, since publications on HIV followed similar patterns to previous years. By 2021, this imbalance had reversed, with more COVID-19-related papers authored by women than men. Conclusions: These data suggest women from Victoria were less able to rapidly transition to new research early in the pandemic but had accommodated to the new conditions by 2021. This work indicates we need strategies to support women in science as the pandemic continues and to continue to monitor the situation for its impact on vulnerable groups.
Keywords: COVID-19; Female; Gender; Productivity; Publishing; R; SARS-CoV2; Women
Description: Available online 3 February 2023
Rights: © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/ 4.0/).
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115761
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1128646
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FT180100565
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE140100003
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115761
Appears in Collections:Mathematical Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_137886.pdfPublished version3.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.