Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/138333
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlamir, M.A.-
dc.contributor.authorHansen, K.L.-
dc.contributor.authorZajamsek, B.-
dc.contributor.authorCatcheside, P.-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019; 114:109317-1-109317-9-
dc.identifier.issn1364-0321-
dc.identifier.issn1879-0690-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/138333-
dc.descriptionAvailable online 14 August 2019-
dc.description.abstractLaboratory listening tests are a fundamental part of identifying and quantifying human perceptual responses to noise, including wind farm noise (WFN); a low-frequency environmental noise with time-varying components with the potential to impact more people as wind farm facilities continue to expand worldwide. Design characteristics of WFN listening tests vary between studies. This likely impacts WFN listening test results and makes quantitative comparisons difficult between studies. Accordingly, this paper reviews the available literature regarding WFN listening test methods, their overall characteristics and potentially important differences in noise stimuli and rating methods used. The key design variables explored include participant selection, stimuli duration, signal synthesis methods, noise reproduction methods and listening room characteristics. Listening test results from studies that have investigated the perceptual effects of various WFN components such as lowfrequency noise and infrasound, tonality and amplitude modulation are presented. The impact on listening tests of factors unrelated to noise such as sensory acuity and sensitivity, attitudes/beliefs and visual effects are also explored. It is shown that some WFN characteristics have received limited attention to date in listening tests. These include broadband low-frequency noise, tonal noise, tonal amplitude modulation and amplitude modulation parameters such as modulation frequency and intermittency. The relative importance of acoustic and non-acoustic factors to human perception is also largely unknown and requires well-designed listening tests to help elucidate.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMahmoud A. Alamir, Kristy L. Hansen, Branko Zajamsek, Peter Catcheside-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.rights© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109317-
dc.subjectWind energy; Environmental noise; Wind farm noise; Amplitude modulation; Low-frequency noise; Listening tests; Annoyance-
dc.titleSubjective responses to wind farm noise: A review of laboratory listening test methods-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rser.2019.109317-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE180100022-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1113571-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidCatcheside, P. [0000-0002-9372-6788]-
Appears in Collections:Physiology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.