Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/138762
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Growth of late preterm infants fed nutrient-enriched formula to 120 days corrected age-A randomized controlled trial.
Author: Best, K.P.
Yelland, L.N.
Collins, C.T.
McPhee, A.J.
Rogers, G.B.
Choo, J.
Gibson, R.A.
Murguia-Peniche, T.
Varghese, J.
Cooper, T.R.
Makrides, M.
Citation: Frontiers in Pediatrics, 2023; 11:1146089-1146089
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
Issue Date: 2023
ISSN: 2296-2360
2296-2360
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Karen P. Best, Lisa N. Yelland, Carmel T. Collins, Andrew J. McPhee, Geraint B. Rogers, Jocelyn Choo, Robert A. Gibson, Teresa Murguia-Peniche, Jojy Varghese, Timothy R. Cooper, and Maria Makrides
Abstract: Objectives: We aimed to compare the effects of nutrient-enriched formula with standard term formula on rate of body weight gain of late preterm infants appropriately grown for gestational age. Study design: A multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. Late preterm infants(34–37 weeks’ gestation), with weight appropriate for gestational age (AGA), were randomized to nutrient enriched formula (NEF) with increased calories (22 kcal/30 ml) from protein, added bovine milk fat globule membrane, vitamin D and butyrate or standard term formula 20 kcal/30 ml (STF). Breastfed term infants were enrolled as an observational reference group (BFR). Primary outcome was rate of body weight gain from enrollment to 120 days corrected age (d/CA). Planned sample size was 100 infants per group. Secondary outcomes included body composition, weight, head circumference and length gain, and medically confirmed adverse events to 365 d/CA. Results: The trial was terminated early due to recruitment challenges and sample size was substantially reduced. 40 infants were randomized to NEF (n = 22) and STF (n = 18). 39 infants were enrolled in the BFR group. At 120 d/CA there was no evidence of a difference in weight gain between randomized groups (mean difference 1.77 g/day, 95% CI, −1.63 to 5.18, P = 0.31). Secondary outcomes showed a significant reduction in risk of infectious illness in the NEF group at 120 d/CA [relative risk 0.37 (95% CI, 0.16–0.85), P = 0.02]. Conclusion: We saw no difference in rate of bodyweight gain between AGA late preterm infants fed NEF compared to STF. Results should be interpreted with caution due to small sample size.
Keywords: preterm
nutrition
infant feeding
nutrient enriched formula
infant growth
late preterm
Rights: © 2023 Best, Yelland, Collins, McPhee, Rogers, Choo, Gibson, Murguia-Peniche, Varghese, Cooper and Makrides. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1146089
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1061704
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1146089
Appears in Collections:Paediatrics publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_138762.pdfPublished version722.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.