Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/140102
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews
Author: Munn, Z.
Stone, J.
Aromataris, E.
Klugar, M.
Sears, K.
Leonardi-Bee, J.
Barker, T.H.
Citation: JBI Evidence Synthesis, 2023; 21(3):467-471
Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Issue Date: 2023
ISSN: 2689-8381
2689-8381
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Zachary Munn, Jennifer C. Stone, Edoardo Aromataris, Miloslav Klugar, Kim Sears, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Timothy Hugh Barker
Abstract: A key step in the systematic review process is the assessment of the methodological quality (or risk of bias) of the included studies. At JBI, we have developed several tools to assist with this evaluation. As evidence synthesis methods continue to evolve, it has been necessary to revise and reflect on JBI's current approach to critical appraisal and to plan a strategy for the future. In this first paper of a series focusing on risk of bias assessment, we introduce our vision for risk of bias assessment for JBI. In future papers in this series, the methodological approach taken for this revision process will be discussed, along with the revised tools and guidance for using these tools.
Keywords: critical appraisal; methodological quality; risk of bias; systematic reviews
Rights: © 2022 JBI
DOI: 10.11124/jbies-22-00224
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1195676
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/jbies-22-00224
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications
Translational Health Science publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.