Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/140466
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBarbour, Kim-
dc.contributor.advisorPugsley, Peter C.-
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Caitlin Anne-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/140466-
dc.description.abstractMimic vlogs are a form of fictional web content produced to replicate the style and feel of the video blog (vlog), a user-generated format popularised on YouTube. Mimic vlogs predominantly adapt well-known, existing stories, and many of the web series are very successful with some having millions of views across the series. As many mimic vlogs are transmedia texts, existing literature in the field tends to approach these texts with a focus on their transmedia elements, which limits our understanding of the videos and how audiences respond and interact with them. However, while formats associated with user-generated content such as mimic vlogs offer an opportunity to tell online stories in novel and interesting ways, they also have the capacity to mislead audiences who take them at face value. In this research, I take an exploratory, audience-centred approach to mimic vlogs in order to understand how audiences perceive this format. With the aim of examining what audiences look for when identifying mimic vlogs, I surveyed and interviewed participants to gather primary data that unpacks how audiences perceive speakers and what key factors they use to determine if something is fictional. Furthermore, given mimic vlogs are one piece of a wider replica content phenomenon, I questioned participants on how they viewed these mimic vlogs in comparison to other types of content that replicates ‘authentic’ styles. My findings highlight how mimic vlogs, much like mockumentaries, make use of the “false signifiers of reality” that make the formats’ factual counterparts (standard vlogs and documentaries, respectively) seem real. Participants frequently relied on their subjective perception of content to identify the format, rather than seemingly concrete factors. The participants often came to different, or opposing, conclusions about the videos, despite referencing the same details. This multiplicity of responses supports audience reception theory which states that all viewers bring their own understanding to a text. Additionally, some participants view this more banal form of mimicry to be of little to no consequence for them personally. This dismissiveness has ramifications for audiences’ abilities to identify more ‘malicious’ forms of replica content, such as deepfakes and disinformation. While mimic vlogs as a YouTube format were in their prime during the mid-2010s, they set the precedent for emerging storytelling techniques on other platforms that feature user-generated content. Similar stories are now appearing on platforms such as Instagram and TikTok, and my research on mimic vlogs helps to explicate how newer formats of replica content work, and how audiences make sense of what they are seeing. In understanding what factors mislead audience members, we can better ensure that viewers are equipped to identify content which replicates user-generated formats, including those on emerging platforms.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectMimic vlogsen
dc.subjectYouTubeen
dc.subjectonline storytellingen
dc.subjectaudience studiesen
dc.subjectweb seriesen
dc.subjectmisinformationen
dc.subjectdigital mediaen
dc.subjectreplica contenten
dc.titleMedia Mimicry - How ‘Mimic Vlogs’ Emulate User-Generated Content in Online Storiesen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Humanities : Mediaen
dc.provenanceThis electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legalsen
dc.description.dissertationThesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Humanities, 2024en
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Adams2023_PhD.pdf3.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.