Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/140511
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Are e-Health Interventions Effective in Reducing Diabetes-Related Distress and Depression in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Author: Fernández-Rodríguez, R.
Zhao, L.
Bizzozero-Peroni, B.
Martínez-Vizcaíno, V.
Mesas, A.E.
Wittert, G.
Heilbronn, L.K.
Citation: Telemedicine and e-Health, 2023; 30(4):919-939
Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert Inc
Issue Date: 2023
ISSN: 1530-5627
1556-3669
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Rubén Fernández-Rodrıguez, Bruno Bizzozero-Peroni, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Arthur Eumann Mesas, Gary Wittert, Leonie K. Heilbronn
Abstract: Background: e-Health refers to any health care service delivered through the internet or related technologies, to improve quality of life. Despite the increasing use of e-health interventions to manage type 2 diabetes (T2D), there is a lack of evidence about the effectiveness on diabetes distress and depression, which are common issues in those living with T2D. Purpose: To synthesize and determine the effects of e-health interventions on diabetes distress and depression among patients with T2D. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and observational cohort studies for the effects of e-health interventions on diabetes distress and depression in patients with T2D up to September 14, 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses 2020 recommendations were followed. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Risk-of-Bias 2 tool (RCTs), the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) (non-RCTs) and the National Institute of Health tool (observational). The standardized mean difference (SMD) and its related 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with the DerSimonian–Laird method through random-effect models. A pooled raw mean difference (MD) meta-analysis was conducted for RCTs comparing the effects of e-health versus control on diabetes distress screening to display the clinical impact. Results: A total of 41 studies (24 RCTs, 14 non-RCTs, and 3 observational) involving 8,667 individuals were included. The pooled SMD for the effect of e-health versus the control group on diabetes distress was -0.14 (95% CI = -0.24 to -0.04; I 2 = 23.9%; n = 10 studies), being -0.06 (95% CI = -0.15 to 0.02; I 2 = 7.8%; n = 16 studies) for depression. The pooled raw MD on diabetes distress screening showed a reduction of -0.54 points (95% CI = -0.81 to -0.27; I 2 = 85.1%; n = 7 studies). Conclusion: e-Health interventions are effective in diminishing diabetes distress among adults with T2D, inducing clinically meaningful reductions.
Keywords: depression
diabetes distress
e-health
emotional burden
meta-analysis
telemedicine
type 2 diabetes
Rights: © Mary Ann Liebert, INC.
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0374
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2023.0374
Appears in Collections:Research Outputs

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.