Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/140713
Type: Thesis
Title: Trait Judgements of Multimodal Emotional Cues
Author: Donaldson, Sophie
Issue Date: 2023
School/Discipline: School of Psychology
Abstract: It is well known that people's perceptions of traits, such as trustworthiness or dominance, are influenced by their facial expressions (Van Der Zant et al., 2021). While studies regarding trait judgements and emotional cues have primarily been based on facial expressions, with literature beginning to analyse postural cues, few studies have explored this judgement concerning vocal emotional cues. As people do not only receive facial expressions when forming judgements about other people's traits, this study aims to examine the trait judgements of participants when presented with faces and voices that portray various emotions. Participants (N = 89) judged the trustworthiness and dominance of four identities (Female N = 2, Male N = 2) displaying four emotions (angry, happy, sad, neutral) via facial and vocal emotional cues. The video clips displayed congruent emotional expressions (both cues express the same emotion) or incongruent expressions (cues express different emotions). As predicted, happy facial expressions were judged to be the most trustworthy and angry facial and vocal expressions were viewed as most dominant. Contrary to predictions, participants perceived neutral voice cues as more trustworthy than all other emotion cues. Participants rated incongruent happy face and neutral voice cues as more trustworthy than congruent happy cues. Congruent angry stimuli were perceived as more dominant than all other incongruent stimuli. The results demonstrate that vocal emotional expressions can influence trait judgements of others.
Dissertation Note: Thesis (B.PsychSc(Hons)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2023
Keywords: Honours; Psychology
Description: This item is only available electronically.
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
Appears in Collections:School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DonaldsonS_2023_hons.pdf587.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.