Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/14677
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of ScienceĀ® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Balancing the evidence: incorporating the synthesis of qualitative data into systematic reviews |
Author: | Pearson, A. |
Citation: | International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 2004; 2(2):45-64 |
Publisher: | Blackwell Publishing Asia |
Issue Date: | 2004 |
ISSN: | 1744-1595 1479-697X |
Abstract: | Techniques for the systematic review of evidence of effectiveness are now well established. Health-care professionals argue, however, for a need to recognise evidence of appropriateness and feasibility and for the development of methodologies to appraise and synthesise the results of qualitative research. This paper describes a participatory project designed to develop systems to systematically review qualitative evidence. The Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument is described in detail, and a suite of programs designed to conduct comprehensive reviews of evidence for health-care practice is outlined. As evidence-based practice increases in sophistication, and its influence in health service delivery expands, the need for broadening the view of what constitutes legitimate evidence is advanced by clinicians and the approach described attempts to achieve a balance in evidence review that recognises the value of quantitative and qualitative evidence. |
Description: | The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1479-6988.2004.00008.x |
Published version: | http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1479-6988.2004.00008.x |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 2 Nursing publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.