Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/14705
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Evans, D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pearson, A. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2001; 10(5):593-599 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0962-1067 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1365-2702 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/14705 | - |
dc.description | The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com | - |
dc.description.abstract | • The past few decades have seen a considerable increase in the number of available health care products and interventions. This growth has been matched by a similar expansion in the health care literature. As a result of these factors, the demand for evidence to support practice is growing, but finding the best evidence is becoming increasingly difficult. • In response, the use of systematic reviews is increasing and they are starting to replace the primary research as the basis for health care decisions. • To date, these reviews have focused predominantly on effectiveness and so have been limited to randomized controlled trials. As a result of this, the interpretive, observational and descriptive research methods that are utilized by nursing have commonly been either excluded from the review or are classified as ‘low level’ evidence. • To address this, nursing must participate in the development of systematic review methods that better answer the questions posed by the profession. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | David Evans & Alan Pearson | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Science Ltd | - |
dc.source.uri | http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00517.x | - |
dc.subject | Humans | - |
dc.subject | Attitude of Health Personnel | - |
dc.subject | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | - |
dc.subject | Nurse's Role | - |
dc.subject | Evidence-Based Medicine | - |
dc.subject | Nursing Research | - |
dc.subject | Knowledge | - |
dc.subject | Research Design | - |
dc.subject | Needs Assessment | - |
dc.subject | Diffusion of Innovation | - |
dc.subject | Information Storage and Retrieval | - |
dc.subject | Nurses | - |
dc.subject | Review Literature as Topic | - |
dc.title | Systematic reviews: gatekeepers of nursing knowledge | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00517.x | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 2 Nursing publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.