Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/14922
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.issued | 1964 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Adelaide Law Review, 1964; 2(2):237-262 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0065-1915 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/14922 | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Painter v. Painter (Matrimonial Causes) pp. 237-242. General Distributors Ltd. v. Paramotors Limited (Mercantile Law) Unauthorised disposition by non-owner - Agency - Parol Evidence Rule - Hire Purchase Agreements Act pp. 242-252. Atkins v. Golding (Ultra vires) Statutory interpretation - prohibition as distinct from regulation pp. 252-256. Wilson v. O'Sullivan and Mills v. Brebner (Police Offences Act) Loitering pp. 256-258. Lamshed v. Lamshed (Laches) Delay after issue of writ pp. 258-262 | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Adelaide Law Review Association, School of Law, University of Adelaide | en |
dc.title | Recent cases | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
Appears in Collections: | ALR Vol. 2, Noes 1-3, 1963-1966 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
alr_V2n2_1964_RecentCases.pdf | 1.45 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.