Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/16329
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Shocking thoughts: A reply to Anne Bottomley |
Author: | Naffine, N. |
Citation: | Feminist Legal Studies, 2004; 12(2):175-180 |
Publisher: | Kluwer Academic Publishers |
Issue Date: | 2004 |
ISSN: | 0966-3622 |
Abstract: | This is a response to an article published in an earlier issue of this journal (Bottomley, A., Feminist Legal Studies 12/1 (2004), 29–65) in which an article by this author was cited as a prime example of a dangerous emerging 'orthodoxy' in feminist legal theory and subjected to a sustained and critical analysis. The purpose of this response is to reflect briefly on the rhetorical style and the theoretical orientation of that article, and to consider their worrying implications for the practice of feminist legal theory as a whole. |
Keywords: | feminism - feminist orthodoxy - feminist theory - theory |
Description: | The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com |
DOI: | 10.1023/B:FEST.0000043306.02781.00 |
Published version: | http://www.springerlink.com/content/wg1230617k6l2m86/ |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 2 Law publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.