Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/17105
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Antenatal screening for Group B Streptococcus: a diagnostic cohort study
Author: Hiller, J.
McDonald, H.
Darbyshire, P.
Crowther, C.
Citation: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2005; 5(12):1-8
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Issue Date: 2005
ISSN: 1471-2393
1471-2393
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Janet E Hiller, Helen M McDonald, Philip Darbyshire and Caroline A Crowther
Abstract: Background: A range of strategies have been adopted to prevent early onset Group B Streptococcal (EOGBS) sepsis, as a consequence of Group B Streptococcal (GBS) vertically acquired infection. This study was designed to provide a scientific basis for optimum timing and method of GBS screening in an Australian setting, to determine whether screening for GBS infection at 35–37 weeks gestation has better predictive values for colonisation at birth than screening at 31–33 weeks, to examine the test characteristics of a risk factor strategy and to determine the test characteristics of low vaginal swabs alone compared with a combination of perianal plus low vaginal swabs per colonisation during labour. Methods: Consented women received vaginal and perianal swabs at 31–33 weeks gestation, 35–38 weeks gestation and during labour. Swabs were cultured on layered horse blood agar and inoculated into selective broth prior to analysis. Test characteristics were calculated with exact confidence intervals for a high risk strategy and for antenatal screening at 31–33 and 35–37 weeks gestation for vaginal cultures alone, perianal cultures alone and combined low vaginal and perianal cultures. Results: The high risk strategy was not informative in predicting GBS status during labour. There is an unequivocal benefit for the identification of women colonised with GBS during labour associated with delaying screening until 36 weeks however the results for method of screening were less definitive with no clear advantage in using a combined low vaginal and perianal swabbing regimen over the use of a low vaginal swab alone. Conclusion: This study can contribute to the development of prevention strategies in that it provides clear evidence for optimal timing of swabs. The addition of a perianal swab does not confer clear benefit. The quantification of advantages and disadvantages provided in this study will facilitate communication with clinicians and pregnant women alike.
Rights: © 2005 Hiller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-5-12
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-5-12
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_17105.pdfPublished version371.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.