Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/17729
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGraves, C.-
dc.contributor.authorThomas, J.-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 2004; 1(1):7-27-
dc.identifier.issn1479-3059-
dc.identifier.issn1479-3067-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/17729-
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2004 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.-
dc.description.abstractAustralian family firms make a significant contribution to the Australian and global economy. Despite the fact that the complexities associated with managing a family business are not addressed by classical management theory, limited empirical research has documented the international expansion of family firms. Building upon the stage model theory, the network theory and the organisation capabilities perspective of internationalisation, this study examines whether family firms differ from non-family firms with regard to the propensity for and extent of their internationalisation. The results, arrived at by using the most recently available longitudinal database of Australian businesses, highlight that family firms are less likely to internationalise compared to non-family firms. Although an examination of internationalised firms found that the extent of internationalisation of family firms is less than that of non-family firms, this difference is not persistently significant over time. This suggests that there is no marked difference in the extent of internationalisation of internationalised family and non-family firms. The results also suggest that older and larger firms, committed to innovation, networking and an orientation towards growth, are more likely to internationalise their operations. Finally, compared to non-family firms, family firms are less likely to engage in networking with other businesses, more likely to exhibit growth profiles typical of lifestyle/traditional firms and be smaller in size. The implications of the findings for theory and practice, and opportunities for future research are discussed.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityChris Graves and Jill Thomas-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherInderscience Publishers-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijgsb.2004.005615-
dc.subjectfamily business-
dc.subjectsmall-to-medium-sized enterprises-
dc.subjectinternationalisation-
dc.subjectinnovation-
dc.subjectnetworking-
dc.subjectcapabilities.-
dc.titleInternationalisation of the family business: a longitudinal perspective-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1504/IJGSB.2004.005615-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidGraves, C. [0000-0003-2456-1702]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Business School publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.