Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/2615
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Taylor, G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wright, D. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Melbourne University Law Review, 2002; 26(3):707-735 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0025-8938 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/2615 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Case Notes: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Melbourne University Law Review | - |
dc.rights | Copyright (c) 2002 Melbourne University Law Review Association, Inc. | - |
dc.title | Privacy, injunctions and possums: An analysis of the High Court's decision | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 6 Law publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.