Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/27216
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Monetary remedies under the Trade Practices Act |
Author: | Wright, D. |
Citation: | Australian Bar Review, 2002; 22:39-62 |
Publisher: | LexisNexis Butterworths |
Issue Date: | 2002 |
ISSN: | 0814-8589 |
Abstract: | With the Trade Practices Act becoming increasingly more important in litigation, it is strange that there has not been more attention on the monetary remedies available under that Act. With a recent decision and with another arguement yet to be heard in another case, the High Court is in the process of challenging that obscurity. The monetary remedies are provided under the Act in ss 82 and 87. This article will examine three unexplored aspects of monetary remedies and so highlight the process that the High Court has embarked upon to alter the obscurity of these monetary remedies. The first is the impact of Henville the most recent High Court decision on s 82, while the second aspect that will be examined is the inter-relationship between these monetary remedies. Finally, some brief comments will be made regarding the roles to be played by both the court and the plaintiff in the process of awarding the appropriate remedy under this Act. |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 6 Law publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.