Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/35629
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Conflicts of interest in divisions of general practice |
Author: | Palmer, N. Braunack-Mayer, A. Rogers, W. Provis, C. Cullity, G. |
Citation: | Journal of Medical Ethics, 2006; 32(12):715-717 |
Publisher: | British Med Journal Publ Group |
Issue Date: | 2006 |
ISSN: | 0306-6800 1473-4257 |
Statement of Responsibility: | N Palmer, A Braunack-Mayer, W Rogers, C Provis and G Cullity |
Abstract: | Community-based healthcare organisations manage competing, and often conflicting, priorities. These conflicts can arise from the multiple roles these organisations take up, and from the diverse range of stakeholders to whom they must be responsive. Often such conflicts may be titled conflicts of interest; however, what precisely constitutes such conflicts and what should be done about them is not always clear. Clarity about the duties owed by organisations and the roles they assume can help identify and manage some of these conflicts. Taking divisions of general practice in Australia as an example, this paper sets out to distinguish two main types of conflicts of interest, so that they may be more clearly identified and more effectively managed. |
Keywords: | Humans Physician's Role Physician-Patient Relations Decision Making Family Practice Ethics, Clinical Conflict of Interest Australia |
Description: | Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics. |
DOI: | 10.1136/jme.2005.014811 |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.014811 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 6 Public Health publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hdl_35629.pdf | 95.29 kB | Publisher's PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.