Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/36099
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: As you were? Moral philosophy and the aetiology of moral experience
Author: Cullity, G.
Citation: Philosophical Explorations: an international journal for the philosophy of mind and action, 2006; 9(7):117-131
Publisher: Routledge
Issue Date: 2006
ISSN: 1386-9795
1741-5918
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Garrett Cullity
Abstract: What is the significance of empirical work on moral judgement for moral philosophy? Although the more radical conclusions that some writers have attempted to draw from this work are overstated, few areas of moral philosophy can remain unaffected by it. The most important question it raises is in moral epistemology. Given the explanation of our moral experience, how far can we trust it? Responding to this, the view defended here emphasizes the interrelatedness of moral psychology and moral epistemology. On this view, the empirical study of moral judgement does have important implications for moral philosophy. But moral philosophy also has important implications for the empirical study of moral judgement.
Keywords: Philosophy of Mind
Description: © Routledge
DOI: 10.1080/13869790500492730
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13869790500492730
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Philosophy publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.