Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/46648
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLynch, A.-
dc.contributor.authorReilly, A.-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationFlinders Law Journal, 2007; 10(1):105-142-
dc.identifier.issn1325-3387-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/46648-
dc.description.abstractWhether forms of detention introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament are valid in light of the powers of separation implied by the Constitution - outline of the High Court's approach to separation of power - validity of terrorism detention orders in Division 104 and 105 of the Criminal Code are uncertain - orders transgress fundamental freedoms protected by the rule of law.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAndrew Lynch and Alexander Reilly-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSchool of Law, Flinders University of South Australia-
dc.titleThe constitutional validity of terrorism orders of control and preventative detention-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidReilly, A. [0000-0002-9675-4784]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.