Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/46648
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lynch, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Reilly, A. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Flinders Law Journal, 2007; 10(1):105-142 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1325-3387 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/46648 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Whether forms of detention introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament are valid in light of the powers of separation implied by the Constitution - outline of the High Court's approach to separation of power - validity of terrorism detention orders in Division 104 and 105 of the Criminal Code are uncertain - orders transgress fundamental freedoms protected by the rule of law. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Andrew Lynch and Alexander Reilly | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | School of Law, Flinders University of South Australia | - |
dc.title | The constitutional validity of terrorism orders of control and preventative detention | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Reilly, A. [0000-0002-9675-4784] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Law publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.