Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/47344
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCover, R.-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationSocial Semiotics, 2002; 12(3):169-190-
dc.identifier.issn1035-0330-
dc.identifier.issn1470-1219-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/47344-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the way in which processes of signification in contemporary culture are governed by motifs of ownership--who has the 'right' to make the 'right' kind of signification, whose significatory powers can be considered to be dominant, and what sorts of ethical considerations can be applied to the granting of meaning and implication. By examining contemporary political graffiti, issues of globalisation and debates over the figurative term 'cunt', the article discusses the inefficacy of claims to significatory 'ownership' while making a case for contingent practices of 'fixing' signification for local political praxis.-
dc.description.urihttp://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all?content=10.1080/10350330216370-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherRoutledge-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330216370-
dc.titleSome Cunts: Graffiti, Globalisation, Injurious Speech and 'Owning' Signification-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10350330216370-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Media Studies publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.