Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/48012
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of ScienceĀ® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Anikeeva, O. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Braunack-Mayer, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Street, J. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Medical Journal of Australia, 2008; 189(3):148-150 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0025-729X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1326-5377 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/48012 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <h4>Objectives</h4>To explore general practitioners' perceptions of their preparedness for an influenza pandemic, the changes they would make to their practice, and the ethical justifications for their planned actions.<h4>Design and setting</h4>A qualitative study was performed among South Australian GPs between March and October 2007. A semi-structured interview was carried out with each participant in his or her practice, and the interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.<h4>Participants</h4>10 GPs were recruited: five from a metropolitan Division and five from a rural Division of General Practice.<h4>Results</h4>Some participants felt they would not be able to cope with an influenza pandemic, while others felt it would simply mean an increase in their workloads. Most respondents considered creating separate waiting rooms, moving the reception desk outside of the practice and delaying all non-urgent consultations in order to deal with a pandemic more effectively. Respondents mentioned the conflict between their various roles and responsibilities as a primary source of tension when thinking about the way they would organise their work in the event of a pandemic. A number of GPs said they would not practise in the event of a pandemic, as they felt their responsibility to their families outweighed that to their patients.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Professional codes of ethics should include guidance about the scope of the duty to treat during infectious disease outbreaks. The community has to uphold the value of reciprocity, and ensure that GPs and their families are provided with support during a pandemic and are given the opportunity to be actively involved in pandemic preparedness planning. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Olga Anikeeva, Annette J Braunack-Mayer and Jackie M Street | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Australasian Med Publ Co Ltd | - |
dc.source.uri | http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/189_03_040808/ani10243_fm.html | - |
dc.subject | Humans | - |
dc.subject | Community-Acquired Infections | - |
dc.subject | Antiviral Agents | - |
dc.subject | Attitude of Health Personnel | - |
dc.subject | Physician's Role | - |
dc.subject | Family Practice | - |
dc.subject | Disease Outbreaks | - |
dc.subject | Qualitative Research | - |
dc.subject | Adult | - |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject | Physicians, Family | - |
dc.subject | Health Plan Implementation | - |
dc.subject | Primary Health Care | - |
dc.subject | Australia | - |
dc.subject | Female | - |
dc.subject | Male | - |
dc.subject | Influenza, Human | - |
dc.subject | Practice Patterns, Physicians' | - |
dc.title | How will Australian general practitioners respond to an influenza pandemic? A qualitative study of ethical values | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01948.x | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Anikeeva, O. [0000-0001-7097-6322] | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Braunack-Mayer, A. [0000-0003-4427-0224] | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Street, J. [0000-0002-1033-4341] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Public Health publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.