Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/53637
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cranston, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Crockett, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Moss, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pegram, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Stocks, N. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Medical Journal of Australia, 2008; 188(8 Suppl):S50-S52 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0025-729X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1326-5377 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/53637 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To review the literature for any promising strategies for the primary care management of mild-to-moderate asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults. Methods: Using “MeSH” terms for COPD, asthma and primary health care, we conducted an extensive literature search for relevant meta-analyses, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, reports and individual studies. Grey literature was also included. We chose a narrative review approach because of substantial heterogeneity of study designs in the literature. Results: 1119 articles of potential relevance were retained, of which 246 were included in our review. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether general practitioners with a special interest (GPwSI) in respiratory care improved the diagnosis and management of mild-to-moderate COPD. An asthma service involving GPwSI increased respiratory drug costs but reduced the costs for less specific drugs. No clear benefit has been shown for practice nurse-run asthma clinics in primary care compared with usual care in altering asthma morbidity, quality of life, lung function or medication use. Evidence to determine the effectiveness of practice nurse-run COPD clinics could not be found. Self-management education, GP review and action plans may produce short-term benefits for asthma patients, particularly those with moderate-to-severe disease, but the evidence for a similar approach to patients with mild-to-moderate COPD is equivocal. There has been poor uptake of respiratory clinical guidelines relevant to primary care — partly because most guidelines are based on moderate-to-severe disease. Spirometry programs in primary care are useful for differential diagnosis of asthma and COPD. Spirometry may alter the management of mild asthma, but there is a lack of evidence that it alters the management of COPD in primary care. Conclusion: The role of primary health care in management of mild-to-moderate asthma and COPD requires further investigation using randomised controlled trials. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Josephine M. Cranston, Alan J. Crockett, John R. Moss, Robert W. Pegram and Nigel P. Stocks | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Australasian Med Publ Co Ltd | - |
dc.source.uri | http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/188_08_210408/cra11057_fm.html | - |
dc.subject | Humans | - |
dc.subject | Asthma | - |
dc.subject | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive | - |
dc.subject | Models, Theoretical | - |
dc.subject | Primary Health Care | - |
dc.title | Models of chronic disease management in primary care for patients with mild-to-moderate asthma or COPD: a narrative review | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01744.x | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Moss, J. [0000-0003-4216-1761] | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Stocks, N. [0000-0002-9018-0361] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 5 General Practice publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.