Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/55028
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJamieson, G.-
dc.contributor.authorThompson, S.-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Surgery, 2009; 96(1):21-25-
dc.identifier.issn0007-1323-
dc.identifier.issn1365-2168-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/55028-
dc.description.abstract<h4>Background</h4>The importance of lymph node status in oesophageal cancer cannot be disputed. It is therefore surprising that no standardization exists in either terminology or methodology in lymph node analysis.<h4>Methods</h4>All online databases were searched to identify articles published from 1970 onwards. This was supplemented by hand searching references of retrieved articles.<h4>Results and conclusion</h4>Without accurate identification of lymph node metastases, patients cannot be staged properly, nor can best practice for the treatment of oesophageal cancer be determined. This review outlines the problem and proposes recommendations for standardization in terminology and methodology for the detection of lymph node metastases in oesophageal cancer.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityG. G. Jamieson and S. K. Thompson-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6411-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectEsophageal Neoplasms-
dc.subjectLymphatic Metastasis-
dc.subjectLymph Node Excision-
dc.subjectTerminology as Topic-
dc.titleDetection of lymph node metastases in oesophageal cancer-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bjs.6411-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Surgery publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.