Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/55327
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMalhi, G.-
dc.contributor.authorNg, F.-
dc.contributor.authorBerk, M.-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2008; 42(4):346-349-
dc.identifier.issn0004-8674-
dc.identifier.issn1440-1614-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/55327-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Venlafaxine and mirtazapine in combination are increasingly used in clinical practice to treat treatment-refractory depression. Putative efficacy for this combination of antidepressants, beyond that of monotherapy, stems from their synergistic actions. This paper describes a prospective case series that examined the efficacy of the venlafaxine–mirtazapine combination in the treatment of depressed patients who had failed at least one antidepressant trial. Method: Twenty-two depressed patients with major depression were treated with venlafaxine and mirtazapine in combination for an average of just under 8weeks. Baseline ratings on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impression–Severity Scale (CGI-S) were repeated at end-point, determined by the naturalistic termination of the depressive treatment episode or the discontinuation of the combination treatment due to adverse effects. The length of treatment until end-point was documented for each patient. Descriptive statistics were used on the collated data. Results: At baseline, mean scores were 28.8 (SD=3.8) for HAM-D17, 30.1 (SD=5.8) for MADRS, and 4.5 (SD=0.5) for CGI-S, reflecting a cohort at the moderate to severe end of the spectrum. At end-point, mean absolute scores were 10.2 (SD=4.7) for HAM-D17, 10.8 (SD=4.6) for MADRS, and 2.3 (SD=0.6) for CGI-S. Mean change from baseline was 18.6 (SD=6.4) for HAM-D17, 19.3 (SD=6.8) for MADRS, and 2.3 (SD=0.6) for CGI-S. Mean duration of treatment was approximately 8weeks, producing a response rate of 81.8% and a remission rate of 27.3%. Only one patient was unable to tolerate the combination although nearly half (10) had significant side-effects during treatment. Conclusion: This study demonstrates relatively high response and remission rates that are encouraging and contribute to the efficacy database for this antidepressant combination. Further studies using randomized controlled designs are needed.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGin S. Malhi, Felicity Ng and Michael Berk-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Asia-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00048670701881587-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectCyclohexanols-
dc.subjectMianserin-
dc.subjectAntidepressive Agents, Second-Generation-
dc.subjectAntidepressive Agents, Tricyclic-
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome-
dc.subjectDrug Therapy, Combination-
dc.subjectRemission Induction-
dc.subjectSeverity of Illness Index-
dc.subjectCohort Studies-
dc.subjectProspective Studies-
dc.subjectDepressive Disorder-
dc.subjectPsychiatric Status Rating Scales-
dc.subjectDrug Synergism-
dc.subjectAdult-
dc.subjectAged-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectVenlafaxine Hydrochloride-
dc.subjectMirtazapine-
dc.titleDual-dual action? Combining venlafaxine and mirtazapine in the treatment of depression-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00048670701881587-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Psychiatry publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.