Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/57162
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Point-of-care testing for patients with diabetes, hyperlipidaemia or coagulation disorders in the general practice setting: a systematic review
Author: Gialamas, A.
St John, A.
Laurence, C.
Bubner, T.
Beilby, J.
Gill, J.
Glastonbury, B.
Killeen, R.
McKittrick, P.
Shepheard, M.
Thomas, D.
Tideman, P.
Tirrimacco, R.
Worley, P.
Citation: Family Practice, 2010; 27(1):17-24
Publisher: Oxford Univ Press
Issue Date: 2010
ISSN: 0263-2136
1460-2229
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Angela Gialamas, Andrew St John, Caroline Olivia Laurence, Tanya Kaye Bubner and members of the PoCT Management Committee
Abstract: Background. Point-of-care testing (PoCT) is increasingly being used in the general practice setting and has the potential to provide improved health outcomes for patients. Objectives. The aim of the study was to systematically assess the literature relating to the analytical performance, clinical effectiveness, cost and satisfaction of patients and health professionals with PoCT for monitoring patients with diabetes, with hyperlipidaemia or requiring anticoagulant therapy in general practice. Methods. Systematic review and synthesis of randomized and quasi-randomized trials during 1966–2007 was performed. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Current Contents, BIDS and the Cochrane Library databases were searched using key terms relating to PoCT for diabetes (glycosylated haemoglobin, urine albumin creatinine ratio), hyperlipidaemia (total cholesterol, triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein) and anticoagulant therapy (international normalized ratio) in the general practice setting. Results. Nine papers from six randomized or quasi-randomized trials were included in the review. Large between-study heterogeneity made pooling of the data inappropriate. In terms of clinical effectiveness, no study found a significant difference between PoCT and pathology laboratory testing. There was a similar lack of data in relation to the analytical performance of PoCT, to cost outcomes and to patient and health professional satisfaction, making conclusions difficult to infer. Conclusions. This systematic review does not provide robust evidence that PoCT in general practice improves patient health outcomes, that it has comparable analytical quality to pathology laboratory testing, that it is cost-effective compared to usual care or that patients and health professionals find PoCT satisfactory. The number of trials is low, the follow-up of patients is short and many of the trials did not investigate PoCT as a separate intervention.
Keywords: Anticoagulant therapy
diabetes
general practice
hyperlipidaemia
point-of-caretesting
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmp084
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmp084
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
General Practice publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.