Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/57533
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Synthesis and high-resolution NMR structure of a β³-octapeptide with and without a tether introduced by olefin metathesis
Other Titles: Synthesis and high-resolution NMR structure of a beta(3)-octapeptide with and without a tether introduced by olefin metathesis
Author: Ebert, M.
Gardiner, J.
Ballet, S.
Abell, A.
Seebach, D.
Citation: Helvetica Chimica Acta, 2009; 92(12):2643-2658
Publisher: Wiley-V C H Verlag GMBH
Issue Date: 2009
ISSN: 0018-019X
1522-2675
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Marc-Olivier Ebert, James Gardiner, Steven Ballet, Andrew D. Abell and Dieter Seebach
Abstract: Bridging between (i)- and (i+3)-positions in a β³-peptide with a tether of appropriate length is expected to prevent the corresponding 3₁₄-helix from unfolding (Fig. 1). The β3-peptide H-β³hVal-β³hLys- β³hSer(All)-β³hPhe-β³hGlu-β³hSer(All)-β³hTyr-β³hIle-OH (1; with allylated βhSer residues in 3- and 6-position), and three tethered β-peptides 2 – 4 (related to 1 through ring-closing metathesis) have been synthesized (solid-phase coupling, Fmoc strategy, on chlorotrityl resin; Scheme). A comparative CD analysis of the tethered β-peptide 4 and its non-tethered analogue 1 suggests that helical propensity is significantly enhanced (threefold CD intensity) by a (CH2)4 linker between the β3hSer side chains (Fig. 2). This conclusion is based on the premise that the intensity of the negative Cotton effect near 215 nm in the CD spectra of β³-peptides represents a measure of 'helical content'. An NMR analysis in CD3OH of the two β³-octapeptide derivatives without (i.e., 1) and with tether (i.e., 4; Tables 1 – 6, and Figs. 4 and 5) provided structures of a degree of precision (by including the complete set of side chain – side chain and side chain – backbone NOEs) which is unrivaled in b-peptide NMR-solution-structure determination. Comparison of the two structures (Fig. 5) reveals small differences in side-chain arrangements (separate bundles of the ten lowest-energy structures of 1 and 4, Fig. 5, A and B) with little deviation between the two backbones (superposition of all structures of 1 and 4, Fig. 5, C). Thus, the incorporation of a CH2-O-(CH2)4-O-CH2 linker between the backbone of the β³-amino acids in 3- and 6-position (as in 4) does accurately constrain the peptide into a 3₁₄-helix. The NMR analysis, however, does not suggest an increase in the population of a 3₁₄-helical backbone conformation by this linkage. Possible reasons for the discrepancy between the conclusion from the CD spectra and from the NMR analysis are discussed.
Keywords: Beta-Peptides
Olefin metathesis
NMR Spectroscopy
DOI: 10.1002/hlca.200900311
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hlca.200900311
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Chemistry publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.