Adelaide Research & Scholarship
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/58730
| Citations | ||
| Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
|---|---|---|
|
?
|
?
|
|
| Type: | Journal article |
| Title: | The representation of construction |
| Author: | Ridgway, R. |
| Citation: | Architectural Theory Review, 2009; 14(3):267-283 |
| Publisher: | University of Sydney, Department of Architecture, Planning and Allied Arts |
| Issue Date: | 2009 |
| ISSN: | 1326-4826 1755-0475 |
| Statement of Responsibility: | Sam Ridgway |
| Abstract: | The creation of more meaningful, sensory and ethical buildings might be encouraged by rethinking construction teaching in relation to architectural representation. Among other things, this means questioning the supposed neutral and technical relationship between drawings, particularly working drawings, and buildings. This productive relationship results from the desire for efficiency and certainty, but its current dominance has almost totally extinguished the ability of architects to engage in symbolic, architectural representation. Construction courses are the ideal place to re-introduce some critical thinking about what our drawings and building really represent. © 2009 Taylor & Francis. |
| Rights: | © 2009 Taylor & Francis |
| DOI: | 10.1080/13264820903341647 |
| Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13264820903341647 |
| Appears in Collections: | Architecture publications Aurora harvest 5 |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.