Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/6221
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNewbury, J.-
dc.contributor.authorMarley, J.-
dc.contributor.authorBeilby, J.-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationMedical Journal of Australia, 2001; 175(2):104-107-
dc.identifier.issn0025-729X-
dc.identifier.issn1326-5377-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/6221-
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2001 Australasian Medical Publishing-
dc.description.abstract<h4>Objectives</h4>To measure the outcomes of a health assessment, conducted by a nurse, of people aged 75 years and older (75+HA) living independently in their own homes.<h4>Design</h4>Randomised controlled trial (RCT).<h4>Setting</h4>A convenience sample of six general practices within the Adelaide Western Division of General Practice (AWDGP). A random sample of 100 participants was drawn from practice age-sex registers. Data were collected in initial visits between 1 August 1998 and February 1999, then in follow-up visits one year later.<h4>Participants</h4>Participants were aged 75 years and over on 1 August 1998 and living independently in the community. 145 eligible patients were invited to join the study, and 100 of these consented to enrol (69%).<h4>Intervention</h4>A 75+HA conducted in the participant's home by a nurse and reported to their usual general practitioner.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Primary: number of problems in each group; number of participants with problems; and mortality. Secondary: physical function; psychological (including cognitive) function; falls; and admission to institution.<h4>Results</h4>There were no significant differences between the control and intervention groups at follow-up in the number of problems, the number of participants with problems, or mortality. In the intervention group, there was significant improvement in self-rated health, geriatric depression score (GDS 15), and number of falls.<h4>Conclusions</h4>This RCT has not demonstrated improvement in health status of the intervention group which received a 75+HA compared with a control group left to usual care.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJonathan W Newbury, John E Marley and Justin J Beilby-
dc.description.urihttp://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/contents175.html#16jul-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAustralasian Med Publ Co Ltd-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143541.x-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectChronic Disease-
dc.subjectActivities of Daily Living-
dc.subjectGeriatric Assessment-
dc.subjectCause of Death-
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subjectFamily Practice-
dc.subjectAged-
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over-
dc.subjectSouth Australia-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.titleA randomised controlled trial of the outcome of health assessment of people aged 75 years and over-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143541.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
General Practice publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.