1. Adelaide Research & Scholarship
  2. Schools and Disciplines
  3. Law School
  4. Law publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/62398
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDe Lacey, S.-
dc.contributor.authorRogers, W.-
dc.contributor.authorRichards, B.-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Law and Medicine, 2010; 18(1):169-177-
dc.identifier.issn1320-159X-
dc.identifier.issn1320-159X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/62398-
dc.description.abstractThe issue of whether to allow or prohibit the directed anonymous donation of human embryos for reproductive use has been publicly contentious. The claims that directed donation are a donor's autonomous right contrast with claims that the practice is discriminatory. Recent legislation and legal recommendation on the issue has been inconsistent or contradictory. This article specifically addresses the question as to whether the directed donation of embryos is the exercise of free choice or an act of discrimination. This question is considered from both ethical and legal viewpoints.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilitySheryl de Lacey, Wendy Rogers and Bernadette Richards-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherLawbook Co.-
dc.rightsCopyright status unknown-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectEmbryo Disposition-
dc.subjectPrejudice-
dc.subjectDirected Tissue Donation-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.titleDirected embryo donation: Free choice or discrimination?-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidRichards, B. [0000-0001-6448-4954]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.