Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/62949
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLaurence, C.-
dc.contributor.authorGialamas, A.-
dc.contributor.authorBubner, T.-
dc.contributor.authorYelland, L.-
dc.contributor.authorWillson, K.-
dc.contributor.authorRyan, P.-
dc.contributor.authorBeilby, J.-
dc.contributor.authorGill, J.-
dc.contributor.authorGlastonbury, B.-
dc.contributor.authorKilleen, R.-
dc.contributor.authorMcKittrick, P.-
dc.contributor.authorShephard, M.-
dc.contributor.authorSt John, A.-
dc.contributor.authorThomas, D.-
dc.contributor.authorTideman, P.-
dc.contributor.authorTirimacco, R.-
dc.contributor.authorWorley, P.-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of General Practice, 2010; 60(572):166-171-
dc.identifier.issn0960-1643-
dc.identifier.issn1478-5242-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/62949-
dc.description.abstract<h4>Background</h4>Point-of-care testing is increasingly being used in general practice to assist GPs in their management of patients with chronic disease. However, patient satisfaction and acceptability of point-of-care testing in general practice has not been widely studied.<h4>Aim</h4>To determine if patients are more satisfied with point-of-care testing than with pathology laboratory testing for three chronic conditions.<h4>Design of study</h4>As part of a large multicentre, randomised, controlled trial assessing the use of point-of-care testing in Australian general practice, satisfaction was measured for patients having pathology testing performed by point-of-care testing devices or pathology laboratories. Patients in the trial were managed by GPs for diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, and/or anticoagulant therapy.<h4>Method</h4>Patient satisfaction was measured using level of agreement with a variety of statements at the end of the study with a patient satisfaction questionnaire for both the intervention and control groups. Analysis was performed using a mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) with allowance for clustering at the practice level following Box-Cox transformations of the data to achieve normality.<h4>Results</h4>Overall, intervention patients reported that they were satisfied with point-of-care testing. In comparison with the control group, the intervention group had a higher level of agreement than control patients with statements relating to their satisfaction with the collection process (P<0.001) and confidence in the process (P<0.001). They also viewed point-of-care testing as strengthening their relationship with their GP (P = 0.010) and motivational in terms of better managing their condition (P<0.001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>The results from this trial support patient satisfaction and acceptability of point-of-care testing in a general practice setting.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityCaroline O Laurence, Angela Gialamas, Tanya Bubner, Lisa Yelland, Kristyn Willson, Phil Ryan, Justin Beilby, and the Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial Management Group-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherRoyal Coll General Practitioners-
dc.rights© British Journal of General Practice, 2010.-
dc.source.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2828863/?report=abstract-
dc.subjectgeneral practice-
dc.subjectpatients-
dc.subjectpoint-of-care systems-
dc.subjectsatisfaction.-
dc.titlePatient satisfaction with point-of-care testing in general practice-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp10X483508-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidLaurence, C. [0000-0002-8506-5238]-
dc.identifier.orcidGialamas, A. [0000-0001-7440-8154]-
dc.identifier.orcidYelland, L. [0000-0003-3803-8728]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
General Practice publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.